![]() ![]() I have no idea if this idea is even possible, but I want to throw it out there. The hard defined grid would remain whatever the user sets up, like it’s always been with TS, but when you’re on any space, you could: add (v)irtual-space, remove v-space, go to next v-space, go to previous v-space. BetterDummy seems to do the trick, though It exposes almost the perfect resolution. While discussing this matter with István Tóth, the developer of BetterDummy, he came up with an interesting idea. When I tried the ist modification, it seemed to work on some apps, but not Sketch specifically the app fails to launch after the alteration. Ciò induce macOS ad abilitare i meccanismi di visualizzazione appropriati. Using resolution apps doesnt work, as the Mac doesnt seem to expose LoDPI modes at the right sizes. #Betterdummy macos softwareL’app crea fondamentalmente un display virtuale nel software e lo rispecchia su un display reale. Nel frattempo, ha creato un’app, BetterDummy, che potrebbe mitigare il problema. I’m including a screenshot of how the spaces would look, at least in principal. Secondo Toth, il problema potrebbe essere risolvibile tramite un aggiornamento di macOS. There are several spaces I’d do this with. #Betterdummy macos fullMy “D” space (space 7) is where I do all my photo editing, and I like to have those applications expanded to use the full screen (but not actually “full screen” mode), so I’d like to be able to add a couple virtual spaces to my “D” space, one for Affinity Designer, one for Affinity Photo, and one for Lightroom…as an example. My use case would be this - I have 16 spaces, which often isn’t enough. EIZO is a visual technology company that manufactures high-end monitors and display solutions for business, graphics, home entertainment, healthcare. ![]() The gist is that you’d have your standard 2D grid, but for any space you choose, on the fly, you can add or remove more virtual spaces that you could cycle through with a keystroke. What I’m proposing is a “Dynamic 3D”, or “2.5D” grid, it has all the benefits of a true 3D grid, but much more efficient and sensible. 4x4x4, 64 total spaces) is inefficient and kinda stupid. I have a feature request - if it’s possible at all, I suspect it would be best implemented at the beginning states of wring the app because it would probably require the fundamental architecture work a particular way to accomplish this…so I’m writing this now, to whoever will be taking it over ( I may have missed some) I’m really happy to hear it’ll be turned over to new developers who’ll run with the project. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |